Joe Biden’s Justice Department Keeps Defending Fossil Fuel Projects

A flag at the Line 3 pipeline pumping station near the Itasca State Park, Minnesota on June 7, 2021.

A flag on the Line 3 pipeline pumping station close to the Itasca State Park, Minnesota on June 7, 2021.
Photo: Kerem Yucel/AFP (Getty Images)

The Biden administration has been outspoken about its commitments to local weather motion and environmental justice. But, within the authorized area, it retains falling down on the job. The newest disappointment got here Wednesday, when the administration requested a court docket to toss complaints from environmental and tribal teams searching for to cease the Line 3 pipeline in order that the controversial mission can proceed.

“We were hoping that if the Biden team is going to be real about their commitments that they’ve made in the executive orders that they have issued since coming into office on climate, on tribal issues, on environmental justice, that, at a minimum, they weren’t going to come out with a full-throated, doubling-down defense of the Trump administration’s previous decision,” stated Moneen Naismith, an legal professional with Earthjustice concerned within the case. “Unfortunately, that’s what we saw last night in their filing.”

Protests towards the Line 3 pipeline have been mounting this summer season in Minnesota, the place lots of have been arrested in current weeks demonstrating towards quickly-moving development on the final section of the pipeline. The protests are the most recent in a drawn-out, years-long battle over the mission, which is technically a substitute for a decades-old pipeline owned by Canadian oil large Enbridge Energy. If it’s accomplished, the brand new pipeline would carry 760,000 barrels of heavy crude per day from tar sands fields in Canada into the U.S., and lock in fossil gas use for many years to come back.

The full mission is sort of completed. But crucially, Line 3 takes a brand new route in Minnesota, together with by means of the Fond du Lac Reservation and several other treaty lands of Ojibwe bands. It’s this part of the pipeline that has been most contested, as Anishinaabe teams and others have argued that the development violates treaty rights on the land and that native and federal authorities didn’t do their due diligence in approving the mission.

The lawsuit in query was filed late final yr towards the federal authorities by Earthjustice on behalf of two Anishinaabe tribes, Honor the Earth, and the Sierra Club. It argued that the Trump-era Army Corps of Engineers didn’t adequately contemplate tribal rights, local weather change, and different environmental impacts when it authorised the ultimate allow the pipeline wanted. On Wednesday, the Justice Department issued a late-night response brief to the go well with, arguing that the Army Corps of Engineers’ work final yr was simply nice, thanks, and that it didn’t must do any extra work. It additionally requested the court docket to reject any extra arguments from environmental and Indigenous teams and permit the pipeline to maneuver ahead.

“They’re both defending against us and going on the offense,” Nasmith stated.

There have been a variety of methods the Biden administration may have responded to this preliminary submitting, stated Nasmith, that may have despatched a a lot softer message, starting from merely selecting to defend its place with out happening the offense all the best way to agreeing with the plaintiffs and ordering that the Army Corps redo its evaluation. And this specific transfer doesn’t imply that the problem to the pipeline is doomed; the go well with will proceed, and the Army Corps, Nasmith stated, may nonetheless determine to drag the permits impartial of the Department of Justice’s submitting. But with development in Minnesota transferring at a brisk tempo, having the Biden administration’s weight thrown on the facet of the pipeline means it’s loads tougher to sluggish that momentum down.

“It’s not a good sign that they’re doubling down and pushing so hard to defend a decision that is clearly at odds with the policies and the promises that President Biden has made since his election,” Nasmith stated.

While parts of the Biden administration have been onerous at work implementing sweeping local weather coverage and rolling again the environmental injury wrought by the Trump administration, in relation to lawsuits, it’s been a distinct story. At finest, lots of the authorized strikes the administration has made are misguided; at worst, they actively enable fossil gas polluters to maintain on protecting on.

In April, the administration pulled a one-two punch on local weather activists in court docket when it first requested a district court docket to close down a long-standing local weather case towards the federal authorities introduced by 21 younger folks. Two days later, the administration stated it could maintain the Dakota Access pipeline operational whereas a brand new allow was being issued for the controversial pipeline, disappointing activists within the lengthy and drawn-out battle to close that line down. (A choose on Wednesday tossed that lawsuit, delivering a defeat to the Standing Rock Sioux who had been preventing the pipeline for years.) Meanwhile, in May, the Department of Justice signaled that it could help an unlimited oil drilling mission within the Arctic dealing with authorized challenges from Indigenous and conservation teams.

As lawsuits develop into more and more essential strategies for teams and people to set precedents and maintain polluters accountable, the truth that the Biden administration goes to bat for polluters is troubling. It additionally reneges on Biden’s local weather plan through the marketing campaign, which called for the “Justice Department to pursue these cases to the fullest extent permitted by law and, when needed, seek additional legislation as needed to hold corporate executives personally accountable—including jail time where merited.”

“I think it’s great to make promises and make policies that sound great, but at the end of the day you have to put your money where your mouth is and back those words up with actions,” stated Naismith. “With the focus on tribal justice, on environmental justice, it’s really disappointing to this level of all-out defense of a decision that so clearly falls short on all of those issues.”

#Joe #Bidens #Justice #Department #Defending #Fossil #Fuel #Projects