As I sat all the way down to revisit Matthew Vaughn’s adaptation of the Neil Gaiman novel Stardust, a household good friend who was visiting requested me a query. “What are you watching?” “Stardust.” “What’s that?” “This fantasy movie with Michelle Pfeiffer and Robert De Niro.” “I’ve never heard of it.” “Henry Cavill is also in it and he fights Daredevil.” “Ben Affleck?”

I discovered the dialog humorous but additionally extremely telling. That this good friend didn’t know Stardust was not some anomaly. The movie opened 15 years in the past in the present day and in that point definitely discovered its followers, however by no means fairly captured the imaginations of the world in the best way it ought to have. And but, I noticed it when it was launched and liked it. Was I some outlier? What was the issue with Stardust?

Part of the problem might be Rush Hour 3. The Jackie Chan-Chris Tucker motion comedy sequel opened on the identical day and promptly trounced Stardust on the field workplace. That was additionally the second week of the action-packed The Bourne Ultimatum, the third week for the long-awaited The Simpsons Movie, and within the following weeks, the generational comedy Superbad opened, in addition to Rob Zombie’s remake of Halloween. Box workplace competitors was fierce in August 2007, particularly for movies gunning for that youthful viewers Stardust was meant for. It fell out of the highest 10 inside a month. Internationally it did considerably higher, however that preliminary intestine punch on the U.S. field workplace did the movie’s legacy no favors. Fewer eyeballs upon preliminary launch meant much less advertising {dollars} shifting forward and a comparatively quiet arrival within the residence market.

Fifteen years later although, nobody is speaking about Rush Hour 3 anymore. That’s as a result of Stardust has one thing going for a lot of different movies don’t: it’s actually freaking good. Who higher than Neil Gaiman to craft a memorable, imaginative story? What higher time in a director’s profession than their second movie, which Stardust was for Matthew Vaughn, for a filmmaker to take an enormous step up? And the forged, whereas headlined with steadfast stars of the day like Pfeiffer and De Niro, was crammed with unbelievable expertise from prime to backside: Claire Danes, Charlie Cox (the aforementioned Daredevil, after all), Mark Strong, Rupert Everett, Henry Cavill, Sienna Miller, Ricky Gervais, Ben Barnes, Peter O’Toole, Ian McKellen, really, the record goes on and on. That a number of of them have change into much more well-known for the reason that movie’s launch solely provides to its success.

As a end result, although Stardust was not a field workplace sensation; it was a crucial come across its launch and stays as strong and entertaining a movie as ever. In giant half that does need to do with seeing this unbelievable forged work their magic on this story. But it’s additionally the brilliance, complexities, and scope of the story itself. At its coronary heart, Stardust is the story of a younger, lovesick boy named Tristan (Cox) who decides to cross a wall that separates his world from one other to retrieve a fallen star for his crush, Victoria (Miller). He finds the star however it’s truly an individual named Yvaine (Danes) and because the two attempt to get again to Victoria, they’re pursued by the witch Lamia (Pfeiffer) who needs to eat the star—actually—and a number of other princes (Strong and others) who want the star to change into king of the realm. It sounds sophisticated however Vaughn and co-writer Jane Goldman (who additionally did Kick-Ass, X-Men: First Class, and extra after Stardust) lay it out very merely. The movie then unspools in a way that retains every little thing cohesive and propulsive. There are not any frills and the movie is best off for it.

Along the best way, Gaiman’s world bustles with creativeness; it’s crammed with components just like the pirate Captain Shakespeare (De Niro), who flies throughout the skies in his ship, sells lightning bolts, and hides his charming true self. The means folks journey by way of candlelight. That flowers provide safety from magic. Or how when every would-be-king dies they change into ghosts who look as they did at loss of life and proceed to change into a Greek refrain to the movie’s occasions. And simply when the movie seems like it might’t get any extra adventurous or bizarre, the burgeoning love story between Tristan and Yvaine turns into extra distinguished and shifting as each Cox and Danes electrify the display with infectious pleasure and marvel. If it wasn’t for a 3rd act that drags out only a bit too lengthy, and some un-PC moments that haven’t aged properly, I’d be hard-pressed to say a single dangerous factor about Stardust.

So whereas the movie didn’t instantly seize the creativeness of the movie-going public 15 years in the past, I used to be delighted to find that Stardust will not be a movie beholden to time. It’s so enjoyable, heartwarming, and well-made that it’s positive to endure and seize imaginations from now till ceaselessly. Simply put, Stardust is magic, and that it might nonetheless work its spell in any case this time is a testomony to its high quality.

Stardust is at the moment streaming on HBO Max.

Want extra io9 information? Check out when to count on the most recent Marvel and Star Wars releases, what’s subsequent for the DC Universe on movie and TV, and every little thing it’s worthwhile to learn about House of the Dragon and Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.