Inside the Industry Push to Label Your Yogurt Cup ‘Recyclable’

This story was initially printed by Grist. You can subscribe to its weekly newsletter here.

Plastic recycling labels are in every single place: The ubiquitous “chasing arrows” image adorns every part from plastic baggage and water bottles to youngsters’ toys.

Most generally, these symbols seem with a quantity — 1 by way of 7 — that identifies the kind of plastic resin a product is made from. A number one, for example, corresponds to polyethylene terephthalate, or PET — the stuff that makes up water bottles. Number 6 is for polystyrene, utilized in foam cups and trays. The plastics {industry} insists these icons have been by no means meant to point a product’s recyclability, despite the fact that that’s how they’re typically perceived by shoppers.

In truth, most plastics aren’t recyclable, largely as a result of there isn’t a marketplace for supplies labeled 3 by way of 7. But that hasn’t stopped the widespread use of the chasing arrows.

With no federal program to judge merchandise’ recyclability and problem labels for them, third-party organizations have stepped in to play this function as an alternative. One group particularly, How2Recycle, has devised an elaborate hierarchy with a number of variations of its personal recycling image, which it sells to a whole bunch of firms starting from Lowe’s to Beyond Meat.

The group, whose guardian nonprofit is predicated in Virginia, says it analyzes waste administration methods nationwide to determine whether or not firms’ merchandise and packaging are recyclable after which points a corresponding label. It’s ostensibly an try and clear up confusion amongst shoppers about what ought to and shouldn’t go into the blue bin. The group describes its markers as “recycling labels that make sense.”

This summer time, How2Recycle declared a giant victory for the businesses it sells labels to: It now considers a large set of merchandise produced from polypropylene, or PP — the resin similar to the quantity 5 — to be “widely recyclable,” that means the group thinks that greater than 60 % of Americans have entry to a curbside or drop-off recycling program that accepts them. Polypropylene accounts for about 14 % of the U.S.’s plastic manufacturing.

The announcement makes polypropylene tubs, bottles, and jars — issues like yogurt containers and ketchup bottles — eligible for How2Recycle’s top-tier recycling label: a chasing arrows image with no {qualifications}.

But {industry} specialists and environmental advocates have raised their eyebrows. Based on federal recycling information, unbiased nationwide waste administration surveys, and firsthand accounts from materials sorting services, polypropylene recycling isn’t practically as widespread as How2Recycle’s labeling implies. Even if PP merchandise have been technically accepted by services that serve a majority of Americans — which researchers say they don’t seem to be — polypropylene is way more generally landfilled or incinerated than became new merchandise. This is as a result of it’s typically crammed with poisonous chemical components or contaminated with meals waste, each of which make it tough to show it into new merchandise. It’s often much less economical to type out polypropylene for recycling than to easily discard it and make new merchandise from virgin materials.

“Post-consumer PP packaging and products have never been recyclable or recycled … above a few percent,” stated Jan Dell, an unbiased chemical engineer and founding father of the advocacy group The Last Beach Cleanup. Through How2Recycle, she stated, plastic and packaging firms are “creating their own non-verified data” and ignoring key provisions of the Federal Trade Commission’s Green Guides, a set of necessities meant to stop firms from making misleading claims concerning the environmental advantages of their merchandise.

As a outcome, Dell stated, the {industry} has been allowed to deepen the general public’s confusion about recycling, gulling folks and policymakers into considering that it is going to be in a position to hold tempo with plastic manufacturers’ plans to dramatically scale up production.

How2Recycle is a part of a labyrinth of organizations and {industry} membership applications that promote “sustainable materials management.” When it formally launched in 2012, the group branded itself as an try and clear up confusion amongst shoppers about what they might recycle. Many firms — together with Yoplait, Costco, REI, and Microsoft — have been quick to sign on, desirous to affix How2Recycle’s labels to their merchandise.

The program took the onus off of particular person firms for claims about recyclability. How2Recycle would do all the required analysis into particular merchandise’ recycling charges and neighborhood entry to recycling applications, permitting contributors to relaxation assured that their recycling labels have been compliant with federal regulation. Today, more than 400 companies pay annual membership charges to put How2Recycle labels on their packages, together with Amazon, Clif Bar, Walmart, Johnson & Johnson, and Starbucks.

At the highest of How2Recycle’s labeling hierarchy is a straightforward “chasing arrows” recycling image, which the group offers to merchandise that it says are accepted by curbside or drop-off recycling applications that serve at the very least 60 % of the American inhabitants. This is the label that How2Recycle stated in late July some polypropylene merchandise would now be eligible for. Previously, in 2020, the group had downgraded PP merchandise from the unqualified chasing arrows to a “Check Locally” label that instructed shoppers to confirm whether or not their neighborhood’s recycling program would settle for them.

“As rigid polypropylene access, sortation, and end markets are on an upward trend across the U.S., we are excited to upgrade this packaging format,” Caroline Cox, How2Recycle’s director, said in a press release this summer time.

However, different sources paint a really completely different image of the United States’ plastic recycling panorama — particularly for polypropylene, which is way harder to show into new merchandise than How2Recycle’s labels make it appear. “It is not possible that 60 percent of Americans have access to established recycling systems that accept PP packaging of any type,” Dell, of The Last Beach Cleanup, stated.

First, she defined, {industry} information means that only 60 percent of Americans have access to any recycling program, not to mention one which accepts polypropylene containers. Most services solely settle for plastics which are simpler to recycle, similar to bottles made from PET. And further information that Dell is compiling for 2022 reveals that solely half of the nation’s 373 materials restoration services, or MRFs — specialised crops that course of and type all of the objects folks toss of their blue bins — say they settle for polypropylene tubs, one of the recyclable PP merchandise on the market (assume margarine containers and cottage cheese cups). As a outcome, solely 28 % of Americans have entry to recycling applications that settle for these polypropylene containers.

“Overall accessibility for plastic recycling has dropped, if anything,” stated John Hocevar, Greenpeace’s oceans marketing campaign director. In current years, labor shortages and excessive costs for recycled supplies have precipitated cuts in curbside recycling programs, and lots of MRFs have stopped accepting most pliable resins.

What’s extra, Hocevar and others argue that the accessibility of recycling applications is a distraction from a extra vital metric: the true recycling charge. Just as a result of polypropylene is collected doesn’t imply it’s going to in the end be recycled. According to the most recent available data from the Environmental Protection Agency, solely 2.7 % of polypropylene “containers and packaging” have been recycled in 2018. If you embrace all types of polypropylene, that quantity falls to simply 0.6 %.

One motive PP is tough to recycle is that it’s not as clear or pure as different kinds of plastic. Unlike merchandise produced from PET or high-density polyethylene (HDPE) — labeled with the numbers 1 and a pair of, respectively — polypropylene merchandise, labeled with the quantity 5, typically comprise poisonous components that make it tough to show them again into usable objects. Another motive is that PP is often collected in bales of blended plastic that embrace a wide range of resins labeled with the numbers 3 by way of 7.

In order to be recycled, PP have to be picked out of those bales after which offered to a particularly restricted variety of services that can truly settle for that plastic. (​​In 2020, Greenpeace estimated that the U.S. solely had sufficient processing capability to recycle lower than 5 % of its PP waste.) The complete course of is prohibitively costly, particularly because the closing product have to be competitively priced towards virgin plastics. According to the EPA, the U.S. generated more than 8 million tons of polypropylene waste in 2018, the newest yr for which information can be found.

Jeff Donlevy, a member of California’s Statewide Commission on Recycling Markets and Curbside Recycling and normal supervisor of Ming’s Recycling, an organization based mostly in northern California, stated that many services proceed to just accept polypropylene — even when they haven’t any intention of recycling it — due to outdated, 10-or-more-year contracts with cities. At the time when many of those contracts have been signed, MRFs stated they’d settle for polypropylene as a result of they might ship blended plastic bales to China for sorting and recycling. But in 2018, when China enacted its “National Sword” coverage and closed its borders to most plastic waste imports, U.S. MRFs have been saddled with a glut of resins which are uneconomical and logistically tough to show into new merchandise.

Of the roughly 80 MRFs in California, Donlevy stated the overwhelming majority aren’t recycling plastics made from resins labeled quantity 3 and above. This consists of polypropylene, quantity 5. Most services are “just landfilling whatever number 5 they get,” he stated.

How2Recycle says on its web site that it takes 4 elements into consideration when figuring out a product’s recyclability — assortment, sortation, reprocessing, and finish markets — however it isn’t clear concerning the actual methodology it makes use of to judge these standards. Much of its information comes from an industry report performed by How2Recycle’s guardian group that appears at a “non-random” pattern of huge recycling applications all through the U.S., together with a random pattern of recycling applications in smaller communities. In the newest version of the report, these censuses consisted of internet searches for every recycling program to find out what sorts of plastic they settle for.

Environmental advocates query the outcomes of those analyses, however they are saying the bigger problem is that How2Recycle fails to say something about the true recycling charge of PP merchandise. Again, the “widely recyclable” label is simply speculated to mirror a cloth’s acceptance by curbside and drop-off recycling applications. But this info will not be printed on the group’s unconditional recycling labels. Donlevy stated this oversight “misleads the public.”

It may contravene sustainable packaging pointers from the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, a authorities company that promotes client safety. By slapping recycling labels with out qualifiers onto polypropylene tubs and different containers, How2Recycle seems to be ignoring key provisions of the FTC’s Green Guides, a set of detailed however nonbinding necessities for claims about merchandise’ environmental advantages. The U.S. authorities doesn’t have a program to problem or approve recycling labels, so that is the first verify for labels created by non-public teams.

At the broadest stage, the FTC says it’s misleading to “misrepresent, directly or by implication, that a product or package is recyclable.” This signifies that firms shouldn’t use a recycling label with out qualifiers — like How2Recycle’s gold normal chasing arrows image — except they will show that recycling services for his or her labeled merchandise can be found to at the very least 60 % of shoppers. Critically, the fee additionally calls on firms to substantiate that these services “will actually recycle, not accept and ultimately discard” labeled merchandise.

Marketers “should not assume that consumers or communities have access to a particular recycling program merely because the program will accept a product,” the FTC says within the Green Guides’ statement of basis and purpose. Although the guides aren’t legally binding, exercise that’s inconsistent with them can be used as evidence of a violation of the FTC Act’s provisions on “Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices” and can lead to fines or additional rulemaking. State governments may cite the Green Guides when constructing false promoting or client safety circumstances.

Dell lamented that the FTC has by no means, to her information, taken motion to cease an organization from misusing an unqualified recycling label. But courts have. Take, for instance, a 2018 lawsuit filed by a client towards Keurig over claims that the corporate’s polypropylene espresso pods have been “recyclable.” Keurig argued that its labels have been in keeping with the Green Guides, however a U.S. District Court in California disagreed and refused to dismiss the case. The court docket stated that even when the espresso pods have been technically collected by municipal recycling applications, they weren’t in observe being recycled. Keurig settled the case this year for $10 million and has modified the labels on its espresso pods.

Greenpeace argues that How2Recycle is utilizing related sleight with its personal labels, claiming recyclability with inadequate substantiation. “Polypropylene does not come close to meeting the requirements” for recycling labels laid out by the FTC, the group stated in a press release. It is neither accepted at recycling services that serve 60 % of the inhabitants nor truly recycled at a major charge.

In response to Grist’s request for remark, Paul Nowak — govt director of How2Recycle’s guardian group, GreenBlue — stated that How2Recycle’s labels not solely fulfill the Green Guides’ necessities however “go beyond them.” Although How2Recycle doesn’t have inside information on the true recycling charge for polypropylene, Nowak stated How2Recycle has reviewed “letters of support” from MRFs saying that they plan to increase their recycling capability for polypropylene. Nowak declined to share these letters with Grist.

How2Recycle’s web site affords some clarification. Although the group claims to think about “sortation” and “reprocessing” for merchandise that can function its labels, How2Recycle explains on-line that it in the end does not take into account the real-world recycling rate when evaluating a product’s recyclability — in distinction to definitions of recyclability from different organizations, just like the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a global nonprofit that advocates for a round economic system.

Nowak insists that How2Recycle spent “several months” verifying information on the elevated recyclability of polypropylene. But Dell thinks there’s an irresolvable battle of curiosity at play, since How2Recycle and the organizations whose information it cites are run and funded by firms that make and promote plastics. “We’ve got all these front groups funded by the plastics and products industry to create and perpetuate the myth that plastics are recyclable,” she stated.

The current push to make polypropylene “widely recyclable” began outdoors How2Recycle, with a separate {industry} group referred to as the Recycling Partnership — a nonprofit whose board of directors consists of executives for main manufacturers and plastic {industry} teams: Keurig Dr. Pepper, Nestlé, the Association of Plastic Recyclers, and the American Beverage Association, amongst others. The group lists roughly 80 “funding partners” on its web site, together with two of North America’s essential petrochemical {industry} commerce teams, the American Chemistry Council and the Plastics Industry Association.

In 2020, a couple of months after How2Recycle downgraded PP merchandise to solely be eligible for the “Check Locally” label, the Recycling Partnership launched a new initiative — immediately funded by many plastic manufacturers and {industry} commerce teams — to “ensure the long-term viability of polypropylene.”

The Recycling Partnership claims it contributed to a spike in polypropylene recycling over the previous two years by way of a sequence of 24 grants value $6.7 million. The group didn’t reply to Grist’s request for extra info, however a press release notes that the funding helped “support sorting improvements and community education across the U.S.” According to the Recycling Partnership, these grants elevated the quantity of polypropylene recovered by 25 million kilos yearly. Now, the group says its proprietary “National Recycling Database” reveals 65 % of Americans gaining access to PP recycling.

According to Nowak, the Recycling Partnership approached How2Recycle with this information in early 2022, requesting that How2Recycle reevaluate its labeling for polypropylene. After what Nowak described as a prolonged analysis course of, he stated the info matched what he was seeing with How2Recycle’s personal evaluation, in addition to info supplied by an outdoor consulting agency. In response to Grist’s request for remark, the consulting agency stated it supplied How2Recycle with access-to-recycling information and “end market” analysis to point out there’s a marketplace for polypropylene that in the end does get recycled. The agency didn’t share information on polypropylene’s actual recycling charge and informed Grist to achieve out to the Recycling Partnership.

How2Recycle, in the meantime, has its personal internet of connections to huge manufacturers and the plastics {industry}. The group’s guardian group, the Sustainable Packaging Coalition, is an {industry} working group whose members embrace Procter and Gamble, Coca-Cola, and the ExxonMobil Chemical Company, in addition to a number of different plastic makers. GreenBlue, the umbrella group that homes How2Recycle and the Sustainable Packaging Coalition, has a board of directors that features executives from the Dow Chemical Company, Mars, the packaging firms Printpack and Westrock, and extra.

Nowak stated he’s conscious of considerations over potential conflicts of curiosity, however that How2Recycle’s guardian organizations are “very careful about who we start to work with.” At How2Recycle, he added, “we stay neutral in all that.”

Dell has typically spoken of the plastic labeling panorama because the “wild, wild West,” with “no sheriff in town” to guard shoppers from misleading recycling claims. The FTC, whose Green Guides may soon be updated for the primary time since 2012, declined to touch upon How2Recycle’s labeling system, and environmental advocates have expressed frustration that the fee hasn’t achieved extra to implement the rules.

Without stronger authorities regulation, Dell stated, “How2Recycle and the product companies have filled the void to become the deciders” of what ought to and shouldn’t bear the recycling label.

But states are catching on. California handed nation-leading legislation final yr making it unlawful for firms to make use of the chasing arrows on merchandise that aren’t truly being became new merchandise. (In this case the state, quite than How2Recycle, will decide recyclability, and it’ll consider each assortment and the true recycling charge.) The regulation is anticipated to eradicate recycling symbols on just about all plastic packaging that isn’t made from number one or quantity 2 resins, since these are the one sorts of plastic at the moment being recycled with important regularity. It may have an effect on different states, too — if plastic producers resolve it’s too cumbersome to create new product strains for the California market, they might resolve to take away recycling symbols for the entire nation.

Hocevar of Greenpeace stated the California invoice is a vital step in the appropriate route and referred to as on different states to undertake related insurance policies. Environmental advocates have additionally cheered a separate effort from the California legal professional normal’s workplace, which introduced in April that it was launching an investigation into the petrochemical {industry}’s “aggressive campaign to deceive the public” concerning the feasibility of recycling.

To actually handle the plastic air pollution disaster, Hocevar and others say that the highest precedence ought to be turning off the faucet — limiting the manufacturing of plastic that in the end must be handled. In the U.S., maybe essentially the most promising transfer on this route is the proposed Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act, a far-reaching federal invoice that will ban carryout plastic baggage and different single-use plastic merchandise, require plastics firms to launch and finance applications to handle the waste they produce, and place a moratorium on new petrochemical services till the EPA can undertake a complete evaluation of the {industry}’s environmental influence.

In the meantime, Donlevy stated that firms ought to cease making an attempt to trick shoppers into feeling good about their plastic consumption. “Producers have to realize they’re using plastic for their benefit and for the consumers’ benefit, which is fine,” he stated. “But to put a recycling symbol and say that that cottage cheese or cream cheese or sour cream container is recyclable? You don’t need to do that, that’s not a part of the sales pitch. … The only plastics that are really getting recycled in the U.S. are number 1 and number 2 bottles.”