Twitter needs a Delaware courtroom to order Elon Musk to purchase the social media service for $44 billion (practically Rs. 3,60,000 crore), as he promised again in April. But what if a decide makes that ruling and Musk balks?

The Tesla billionaire’s status for dismissing authorities pronouncements has some apprehensive that he would possibly flout an unfavourable ruling of the Delaware Court of Chancery, identified for its dealing with of high-profile enterprise disputes.

Musk hopes to win the case that is headed for an October trial. He’s scheduled to be deposed by Twitter attorneys beginning Thursday.

But the implications of him shedding badly — both by an order of “specific performance” that forces him to finish the deal, or by strolling away from Twitter however nonetheless coughing up a billion {dollars} or extra for breach of contract — has raised considerations about how the Delaware courtroom would implement its last ruling.

“The problem with specific performance, especially with Elon Musk, is that it’s unclear whether the order of the court would be obeyed,” retired Delaware Supreme Court Justice Carolyn Berger told CNBC in July. “And the courts in Delaware — courts all over — are very concerned about issuing a decision or issuing an order that then is ignored, flouted.”

Berger, who was additionally a vice chancellor of the Chancery Court within the Eighties and Nineteen Nineties, stood by these considerations in an interview with The Associated Press however mentioned she doubted the Delaware establishment would go as far as to make him full the deal.

“The court can impose sanctions and the court can kind of coerce Musk into taking over the company,” she mentioned. “But why would the courtroom do this when what actually is at stake is cash?”

Berger said she expects Twitter to prevail, but said a less tumultuous remedy for the company and its shareholders would make Musk pay monetary damages. “The court doesn’t want to be in a position to step in and essentially run this company,” she said.

Musk and his lawyers didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Other legal observers say such defiance is almost impossible to imagine, even from a famously combative personality such as Musk. He acknowledged he might lose in August in explaining why he suddenly sold nearly $7 billion (nearly Rs. 57,300 crore) worth of Tesla shares.

“I take him at his word,” mentioned Ann Lipton, an affiliate regulation professor at Tulane University. “He needs to win. Maybe he is bought his personal judgment as to what the percentages are. But he is additionally being form of sensible about this. He’s getting some money prepared so he would not need to dump his Tesla shares if it seems he’s ordered to purchase the corporate.”

A ruling of particular efficiency may power Musk to pay up his $33.5 billion (practically Rs. 2,74,000 crore) private stake within the deal; the value will increase to $44 billion with promised financing from backers similar to Morgan Stanley.

The Delaware courtroom has powers to implement its orders, and will appoint a receivership to grab a few of Musk’s belongings, specifically Tesla inventory, if he would not comply, in response to Tom Lin, a regulation professor at Temple University.

The courtroom has made such strikes earlier than, similar to in 2013 when it held Chinese firm ZTS Digital Networks in contempt and appointed a receiver with energy to grab its belongings. But after coercive sanctions did not work, the receiver requested the courtroom 5 years later to problem bench warrants calling for the arrest of two senior executives the following time they visited the US.

Speculation that Musk might be threatened with jail time for failing to adjust to a ruling is unrealistic, mentioned Berger. “At least, not for the Court of Chancery,” mentioned the previous decide. “That’s not the way the court operates.”

But extra vital, Lin mentioned Musk’s authorized advisers will strongly urge him to adjust to the rulings of a courtroom that routinely takes circumstances involving Tesla and different corporations integrated within the state of Delaware.

“If you are an executive at a major American corporation incorporated in Delaware, it’s very hard for you to do business and defy the chancery court’s orders,” Lin mentioned.

Concerns about Musk’s compliance derive from his previous habits coping with numerous arms of the federal government. In a long-running dispute with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, he was accused of defying a securities fraud settlement that required that his tweets be authorised by a Tesla lawyer earlier than being revealed. He publicly feuded with California officers over whether or not Tesla’s electrical automotive manufacturing facility ought to stay shut down in the course of the early levels of the COVID-19 pandemic.

He’s additionally taken a combative strategy in Delaware Chancery Court, calling an opposing lawyer a “bad human being” whereas defending Tesla’s 2016 acquisition of SolarCity towards a lawsuit that blamed Musk for a deal rife with conflicts of curiosity and damaged guarantees. He and his attorneys produce other Delaware circumstances nonetheless pending, together with one involving his compensation package deal at Tesla.

“I believe we have got a complete lot of gamers who, as unfastened a cannon as Elon Musk is, depend on the goodwill of the Delaware courts on an ongoing foundation for his or her companies,” Lipton said.

Musk’s argument for winning his latest Delaware case largely rests on his allegation that Twitter misrepresented how it measures the magnitude of “spam bot” accounts that are useless to advertisers. But most legal experts believe he faces an uphill battle in convincing Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick, the court’s head judge who is presiding over the case, that something changed since the April merger agreement that justifies terminating the deal.

The trial begins October 17 and whichever side loses can appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, which is expected to act swiftly. Musk and Twitter could also settle the case before, during or after the trial, lawyers said.

Delaware’s courts are well-respected in the business world and any move to flout them would be “shocking and unexpected,” said Paul Regan, associate professor of Widener University’s Delaware Law School who has practiced in Delaware courts since the 1980s. “If there was some kind of crisis like that, I think the reputational harm would be all on Musk, not the court.”